CALIFORNIA NIGHTMARIN’
By Robert McElvaine
“The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”
— William Faulkner
Requiem for a Nun (1951)
“. . . for time past is not believed to have any bearing on time present or future, out in the golden land where every day the world is born anew.”
— Joan Didion
“Some Dreamers of the Golden Dream” (1966)
Let’s talk about California and what it may be saying to us in Mississippi and the rest of the nation about the journey we have been on over the past three decades and where we may be headed now.
It may seem that California has little to say to us in Mississippi. The two states have long been at the opposite poles of America. As the quotations above from leading writers of the two states indicate, so much in our state is tied to the past, while in California it often seems that there is no past.
Here are the contrasting ways in which the states tend to be seen around the country and the world:
Mississippi has been haunted by the Ghost of America Past.
California is haunted by the Ghosts of America Present and
America Yet to Come.
If the states were theme parks, California is Tomorrowland.
Mississippi is Yesterdayland.
Mississippi is about never forgetting the past;
California is about completely forgetting the past.
California has long been seen as being on the cutting edge of progress and change. By the 1960s, the nation's westward movement had been replaced by new trends emanating from California and moving eastward.
“All that is constant about the California of my childhood,” Joan Didion wrote of her home state in 1965, “is the rate at which it disappears.”
Mississippi, on the other hand, has been a place wholly rooted in the past and the most resistant to change.
The rate of change in the two states is even reflected in nature. California is famous for the sudden upheavals of its massive earthquakes. In Mississippi, we have what amount to slow-motion earthquakes in the form of the expansions and contractions of Yazoo Clay.
The geographic extremes in California are vastly greater than in Mississippi. California has, in close proximity, the lowest place in the United States, Death Valley, and the highest in the contiguous 48 states, Mt. Whitney, from 282 feet below sea level to 14,505 feet above—a range of 14,787 feet. Mississippi is all within the narrow range of 806 feet from sea level to the top of the generously named Woodall “Mountain.” (Recall that when Martin Luther King looked forward at the 1963 March on Washington to the day when freedom would ring from various mountains in the South, he referred only to “every hill and molehill of Mississippi”).
In weather, the differences are in some respects not as great. Mississippi has its long, hot summers, in which the weather stays almost exactly the same for weeks on end. Southern California’s weather often seems similarly unchanging. But both locales are subject to “weather of catastrophe”— flash floods with houses sliding down eroded embankments and the warm Santa Ana winds bringing onrushing fire and madness in people in California, and tornadoes and hurricanes in Mississippi.
Yet even in weather, there is much of an omnipresent feeling that the apocalypse may be right around the corner in California. Again, it is Didion who says it best: “The violence and the unpredictability of the Santa Ana affect the entire quality of life in Los Angeles, accentuate its impermanence, its unreliability. The wind shows us how close to the edge we are.”
Mississippi is all about permanence, but the very nature of California is that nothing is intended to be permanent. Movie sets are removed after the picture is finished. Houses slide down cliffs. The ultimate fear is that much of the state will be destroyed by “The Big One”—a gigantic earthquake.
It is very easy to depict California and Mississippi as polar opposites:
“Going south” has a very different meaning than “going west.”
Mississippi was about tradition;
California was about innovation
Mississippi is wet and humid;
California is dry.
Mississippi is all about old;
California is all about new.
Mississippi was the Old South;
California is the New West.
California is change.
Mississippi is anti-change.
♦ ♦ ♦
What, then, can California have to say to us that is worth listening to?
Actually a majority of Mississippians have been listening to and following what has come out of the Golden State for a fairly long time. California was, more than a quarter century ago, the source of a political movement embraced by many Mississippians and of a leader who came to be revered in Mississippi.
In the 1970s, both the conservative anti-tax movement and Ronald Reagan came to us out of California. (We won’t talk now about the other two presidential gifts California presented to the nation, Herbert Hoover and Richard Nixon.)
The nation’s sharp turn to the right took off in 1978. One of the leading indicators of this turn was the passage that year of California Proposition 13, the Jarvis-Gann Initiative, which severely limited property taxes and made future increases in all types of taxes very difficult. It was the beginning of a disaster caused by unchecked direct democracy. Voters in California have increasingly bypassed the legislative process by making key decisions through referenda. That may sound good, but what has happened, unsurprisingly, is that the voters keep voting to tax themselves less and spend more.
The result has been disaster. Before the passage of Pop 13, California had perhaps the best public school system in the nation. In recent years, California schools have ranked last, below Mississippi’s. Today, California is teetering on the edge of one of those cliffs, with a mudslide on the way.
It may not always be true that “you get what you pay for.” But it is usually true that “you don’t get what you don’t pay for.”
Three years after Prop 13, Mr. Reagan brought that California state of mind to Washington.A recent letter to the editor in the Los Angeles Times got it right:
“Ronald Reagan’s dream is finally realized. California will now be a model for a Republican utopia. No taxes. No services. I’m from the private sector, and I’m here to help you.”
California nightmarin’ has become a reality.
Mr. Reagan told us in his first inaugural, “Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.” He set out to lessen that problem, cut top tax rates, and reduce the regulatory powers of the government.
Most Mississippians cheered. The majority view here has long been that big government is dangerous. It is. What is dangerous about it, though, is not the noun, government, but the adjective, big. If big government is dangerous, does not the same apply to big business? Not according to those who joined in the Reagan Revolution. Their attitude was: Don’t worry about how big financial institutions become; they can’t harm us.
We now ought to know better.
Indeed, the need for big government lies very largely in the existence of big business, from which we need powerful government to protect us.
It should be clear now that, under current circumstances, President Reagan’s statement needs modification to: “Big business is not the solution to our problem; business that is too big is the problem.”
♦ ♦ ♦
Democracy is clearly the best political system, but our nation’s Founding Fathers had the good sense to realize that democracy carries with it inherent dangers and so provided a system of checks and balances to rein in its potentially detrimental excesses.
Capitalism is clearly the best economic system, but what we need now are some Fathers and Mothers with the good sense to realize that capitalism carries with it inherent dangers and so to provide a system of checks and balances to rein in its potentially detrimental excesses.
Some of those checks and balances were provided in the New Deal, but they were broken down by the Reaganites, especially during the eight years of the second President Bush.
In California, a large part of the problem is democracy without checks and balances. In the nation as a whole, a large part of the problem is capitalism without checks and balances.
California’s task now is to try to find a way to restore political checks and balances. The nation’s task now is to restore and improve upon those economic checks and balances.
California has always been the cutting edge of the “Reagan Revolution” and that edge has now cut it to the point of the state bleeding out. We need to apply a national tourniquet to stop the bleeding before the nation succumbs to this Golden Bear Flu.
---
Robert McElvaine is the Elizabeth Chisholm Professor of Arts & Letters and Chair, Department of History, at Millsaps College in Jackson. He is also the author of several books, most recently Grand Theft Jesus and is a regular contributor to huffingtonpost.com. McElvaine lives in Clinton and is currently at work on a book about the Sixties.